Mandatory Identity Verification: A Structural Shift

The most significant change is the introduction of mandatory identity verification for UK company directors and persons with significant control (PSCs) under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023.

 

From late 2025 onwards:

• New directors and persons with significant control (PSCs) must verify their identity before appointment,

• Existing directors must complete verification within a transitional period,

• Filings with Companies House require a unique personal verification code.

 

This is not a superficial check. Verification relies on high-assurance identity methods, typically involving biometric passports, facial likeness checks, or equivalent secure credentials via GOV.UK One Login or authorised service providers. For the first time, the UK corporate register is being anchored to state-verified, high-confidence individual identities rather than unverified declarations.

 

More Information see Appendix 1 below

 

Why This Matters for Tax Enforcement

At present, HMRC does not directly use biometric data to track directors or taxpayers, nor does it automatically match airport exit data against tax records. However, the introduction of verified director identities dramatically alters what becomes possible.

 

Once a director’s identity is:

• Verified to a biometric-grade standard,

• Persistently linked to company records,

• Reused across government digital identity platforms,

 

In other words, the historical separation between corporate identity, personal identity, and tax records becomes largely administrative rather than technical. In other words, the hard problem, knowing who a director really is, is being solved.

 

 

Biometrics at Borders: Completing the Identity Loop

In parallel, the UK is investing heavily in biometric border systems, including facial recognition e-gates, identity-linked travel records, and large-scale biometric matching infrastructure within the Home Office. While these systems are currently justified on immigration, security, and efficiency grounds, they have a secondary effect: they generate reliable, identity-linked travel data. 

 

Even without collecting fingerprints or facial scans at every exit point, the UK already maintains exit checks that associate passport identities with departure events. As biometric identity assurance improves, the confidence in those associations increases.

 

From a systems perspective, this creates a future environment where all of the below are verified, identified and possibly cross referenced:

 

• Director’s identity,

• Their company roles,

• Their tax references,

• Their travel history,

 

What better system to control the UK's exit laws as they can all be tied back to the same high-confidence individual, subject to legal authority and safeguards.

 

Why “Tricking the System” Becomes Harder

Historically, tax avoidance and evasion schemes involving company directors have relied on:

 

• Nominee or fictitious directors,

• Identity fragmentation across systems,

• Jurisdictional ambiguity when individuals leave the UK.

 

Mandatory identity verification removes much of that ambiguity. It becomes significantly harder to:

 

• Appoint “front” directors using weak or false identities,

• Dissociate from companies after departure,

• Claim non-residence while remaining operationally involved.

 

While physical exit from the UK does not currently trigger biometric tax checks, the direction of travel is clear: identity, presence, and responsibility are becoming harder to separate.

 

 

Why There Is Little Public Documentation of Integration

Some observers are surprised by the lack of explicit public policy stating that biometric border data will be matched against tax records. This is not unusual. In the UK, capability is often built before policy is fully articulated, particularly where privacy, proportionality, and legislative authority must be carefully navigated. Data-sharing between departments typically expands incrementally, often beginning with:

 

• High-risk cases,

• Court-authorised investigations,

• Targeted anti-fraud initiatives.

 

The absence of a published “biometric tax exit system” should not be mistaken for an absence of intent or feasibility.

 

A Likely Future Scenario

Looking ahead, it is reasonable to expect that:

 

• Verified director identities at Companies House will increasingly inform HMRC risk models,

• Cross-government identity platforms will enable more reliable data matching,

• Border and travel data will be used more strategically in compliance and enforcement cases,

• Directors will be expected to maintain continuous accountability, regardless of physical location.

• United Kingdom travel to Northern Ireland, Wales, Scotland and even the islands (Gibraltar, Falklands, etc.) may require biometrics which means the UK Exit laws will be trickered!

 

This does not imply universal surveillance or automatic tax enforcement at airports. Rather, it signals a future in which identity-based opacity, long exploited in complex corporate structures, steadily erodes.

It also means that the UK's Exit Laws are religiously applied by all as they will not be able to cheat the system by implying less daysa within the UK as their biometic data reports would suggest eitherwise.

 

 

Conclusion

The UK is not building a single, dramatic biometric tax enforcement system. It is doing something more effective: quietly aligning identity infrastructure across corporate, border, and government systems. This will be a very useful tool to apply strict application of its exit laws which are currently being abused by some tax payers who should have been taxed in the United Kingdom but are taxed elsewhere due to their Corporate Structures (result of thorough tax planning).

 

For directors of UK companies, the implication is clear. The space to hide behind weak identities, paper resignations, or physical departure is narrowing. In the coming years, compliance will increasingly follow the individual, not merely the address they last declared. For those operating transparently, this change brings clarity and trust. For those attempting to outpace the system, the window is closing.

 

CYAUSE AUDIT SERVICES

About Us

CYAUSE Audit Services is a regulated audit and assurance firm offering relocation services to many high-net-worth individuals from all over the world, including the United Kingdom. From immigration matters to group tax planning our group of experts ensure that we can accommodate your tax and relocation needs and off course secure you from the UKs aggressive taxation.

CYAUSE Audit Services is an Audit & Assurance firm with offices in Cyprus and the UAE. During 2015 we have been awarded by I.C.P.A.C and the A.C.C.A (local and international association of Chartered Certified Accountants) for the Quality of our Audit Services and our Office's Procedures.

Being a Truly International Audit & Assurance firm, we have associates from all over the world and we are constantly looking for new associates to expand our network further. At present, CYAUSE Audit Services operates internationally through its membership with BKR International amongst the largest American associations in the world, Accace Circle, a co-created business community of like-minded BPO providers and advisors who deliver outstanding services with elevated customer experience. Our network covers almost 40 jurisdictions with over 2,000 professionals, it supports more than 10,000 customers, mostly mid-size and international Fortune 500 companies from various sectors, and processes at least 170,000 payslips globally.

CYAUSE Audit Services Ltd is also a member of BKR International one of the biggest US Accounting Associations of the word and the 3E Accounting Network, an international accounting network which originates from Hong Kong and has more than 80 members from all over the world.

Contact Us

If you would like us to assist you with your investment firm or fund, please contact us at enquiries@cyprusaccountants.com.cy or call us at +357 22 336 309.

Learn More about Cyprus Corporate Environment

Information about CYAUSE Audit Services and the Cyprus Corporate & Tax System can be obtained from our Website or our YouTube channel which provides valuable information about the Corporate & Tax Environment of Cyprus.

---

Appendix 1

In 2025–2026, the United Kingdom has introduced a major shift in how corporate identities are authenticated, a shift that could have profound implications for tax enforcement and corporate transparency in the near future.

 

Mandatory Identity Verification for Company Directors

As part of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA), the UK government has implemented mandatory identity verification for company directors and persons with significant control (PSCs). From 18 November 2025, anyone appointed as a company director in the UK must verify their identity using robust identity documentation before their appointment can be filed with Companies House. Existing directors and PSCs must complete verification within 12 months of the legal requirement’s introduction.

 

This process is designed to ensure:

 

• Directors are real individuals and not fictitious entities,

• False or stolen identities cannot be used to register companies,

• Transparency and data quality of the UK’s corporate register is improved.

 

Although this requirement does not yet directly tie into tax systems, it does place directors in a secure identity ecosystem. The technologies used rely on biometric passports and secure cryptographic verification, effectively linking an individual’s verified legal identity to their directorship record.

 

What the IDV Process Involves

Directors can verify their identity through:

 

• GOV.UK One Login with a biometric passport or other biometric ID documents,

• In-person verification at designated locations with facial matching/ID checks,

• Third-party Authorised Corporate Service Providers (ACSPs) that perform verification and file the results.